User and access inventory
Review users, profiles, permission sets, roles, groups, inactive accounts and privileged access paths.
Review how users, integrations, apps and automations access business data. Establish least-privilege roles, ownership, traceable change controls and practical monitoring without assuming that a checklist alone guarantees compliance.
Connect identity, permissions, sharing, integration accounts, audit evidence and operational ownership.
Security work should be scoped to the org, connected applications, data classification, operating requirements and the client’s risk model.
Review users, profiles, permission sets, roles, groups, inactive accounts and privileged access paths.
Assess org-wide defaults, role hierarchy, sharing rules, field access, record ownership and sensitive record exposure.
Inventory integrations, OAuth scopes, tokens, named credentials, service accounts and least-privilege requirements.
Review flows, Apex, exports, logs, backups, retention and potential unintended data movement.
Define who approves access changes, production changes, exception grants, periodic reviews and evidence retention.
Document findings, affected assets, impact, recommended action, accountable owner and target priority.
Technology choices should follow the business process and operating context. Capture constraints and failure behavior early so implementation teams know what “ready” means.
Grant only the object, field, record and system access needed for a specific role or integration.
Assign clear owners and review cadence to permissions, connected apps, exceptions and release decisions.
Retain decisions and test results that show why a permission or control is appropriate.
Prioritize findings according to business impact and exploitability rather than producing a generic score alone.
This service is a technical configuration and governance review, not a penetration-test certification, legal opinion or guarantee of regulatory compliance. Final acceptance belongs to the client’s security and risk owners.
A consistent sequence makes dependencies visible and reduces the chance that data, integration, permissions or operational needs are discovered at the end of the project.
Map users, roles, permissions, apps, integrations, automations and data classifications.
Compare observed configuration with the client’s security requirements and platform guidance.
Test changes in controlled environments with affected roles and integration paths.
Document owners, review cadence, change controls and monitoring responsibilities.
Use these pages to connect cloud requirements, implementation work and ongoing operations into a clear delivery path.
Final scope depends on the products enabled in your Salesforce environment, access, architecture, licensing and acceptance needs.
No. A technical review can identify configuration and governance risks, but compliance conclusions require the full operating context and appropriate legal, security and assurance stakeholders.
Scope can include OAuth scopes, credentials, service accounts, API access, permission boundaries and change ownership where appropriate access is provided.
No. Changes need impact analysis, test evidence, a controlled rollout and rollback planning to avoid breaking valid business workflows.
Salesforce product names, capabilities, licensing and implementation guidance evolve. Validate current platform requirements before finalizing scope.
Review official trusted, secure and adaptable architecture principles.
Open architecture guidance →Verify current security, permission and identity guidance.
Open Salesforce Help →HISOLIT provides independent consulting and engineering services. Salesforce and related product names are trademarks of Salesforce, Inc. This page does not imply endorsement, affiliation or partner status. Verify third-party credentials directly with the relevant provider.
Share the Salesforce products involved, systems, business goal, current challenges and expected timeline. This helps frame a useful first discussion.