Configuration and customization inventory
Review relevant objects, fields, custom code, flows, validation rules, packages and dependencies.
Build a clear picture of configuration, automation, data quality, security, integrations and release practices. HISOLIT can help turn the findings into a prioritized remediation plan with evidence, owners and acceptance criteria.
Connect evidence from configuration, data, integration, access and operating practice to a usable action plan.
An audit is most useful when it differentiates confirmed issues from assumptions and connects recommendations to business impact.
Review relevant objects, fields, custom code, flows, validation rules, packages and dependencies.
Identify overlapping logic, recursion risks, stale flows, unhandled faults and unclear ownership.
Assess duplicates, required data, identifiers, ownership, retention and stewardship controls.
Review user roles, permission sets, profiles, sharing and least-privilege assumptions.
Inspect mappings, sync failures, retry behavior, stale data and monitoring coverage.
Review environments, change approvals, regression coverage, deployment procedures and rollback readiness.
Technology choices should follow the business process and operating context. Capture constraints and failure behavior early so implementation teams know what “ready” means.
Record observation, evidence, impact, confidence and remediation path.
Prioritize remediation by impact, likelihood, effort and dependencies.
Assign each recommendation to a team and define a measurable completion condition.
Turn fixes into checklists, monitoring and release criteria to prevent recurrence.
Audit coverage depends on access, org complexity, documentation, connected systems and permitted review methods. Security-sensitive findings are shared through an agreed channel with appropriate handling.
A consistent sequence makes dependencies visible and reduces the chance that data, integration, permissions or operational needs are discovered at the end of the project.
Set products, orgs, access, business goals and boundaries.
Review configuration, samples, integrations, change history and operating documents.
Reproduce significant issues and distinguish confirmed risks from hypotheses.
Rank actions, owners, dependencies, acceptance criteria and follow-up checks.
Use these pages to connect cloud requirements, implementation work and ongoing operations into a clear delivery path.
Final scope depends on the products enabled in your Salesforce environment, access, architecture, licensing and acceptance needs.
Scope can cover configuration, customizations, automation, data quality, permissions, integrations, release practices and operational documentation.
The proposed deliverable includes evidence-based findings and a prioritized roadmap, with owners, dependencies and acceptance criteria where the scope provides enough access.
No. An audit is a scoped review, not a guarantee of security, compliance or the absence of defects. Requirements and independent assurance should be validated with qualified specialists as needed.
Salesforce product names, capabilities, licensing and implementation guidance evolve. Validate current platform requirements before finalizing scope.
Validate current configuration and platform guidance.
Open Salesforce Help →Check platform status during incident analysis.
Open Salesforce Trust →HISOLIT provides independent consulting and engineering services. Salesforce and related product names are trademarks of Salesforce, Inc. This page does not imply endorsement, affiliation or partner status. Verify third-party credentials directly with the relevant provider.
Share the Salesforce products involved, systems, business goal, current challenges and expected timeline. This helps frame a useful first discussion.